769
to England, something to be said in favour of his remaining here. But if he remains in the latitude of this (my judgement) he is none the better in relaxation. Illud post battling
55230.10.20
In Boulton's case, he has not obtained any permission from the Circular existing ref 1886, which does not apply to this case as it is subject to certain conditions for employment in their absence.
I doubt, therefore, that this Department has any power or right to forbid them from receiving remuneration for the work done during his leave of absence. I had thought that if I did forbid it, he would probably have the money sent to his wife and thus evade the order.
But I think the recurrence of such cases is new and suggests the need for framing a new Regulation whereby no Officer on leave of absence is permitted to accept any Employment without first obtaining the Express Sanction of the Governor and of the Secretary of State.
Rutt Nov 4 discussed with Sir R Herbert that the terms of the Existing rule do not include this case, and therefore, it is not possible to forbid Boulton from receiving payment. But a hard and fast Rule should be promulgated.
See further II can hardly. Jessel red it on 25/4 and K on 21/4/40.
769
to England, sun thingst be segages in
Büt
work here. But if he resnaries in
the Catitude of this (my)
and
(buchopes harder than he does on this
fromment) he is home the better in
In relaxation. Illud pos
batailing
55230.10.20
In Boulton has not hohen
any
ulation
the Cercular
1
existing ref 1886 does not apps
This can as it is subair theen beneph
pronti employment in ther
Iboust
thonch, therefore, that this tentang of stake has
any power
right to forbed hemm from receiving
xmuneration for the work one during his leave
fatence. I had if i did to fortid, he exclt feren
bably have the money jusin to his wife vis Evade the order. J.
or
thier.
But I thank the recurrence of such cans New
new & suigh Regulation
the city of framing
Kthe fact that..~
fr
Ми
"
A
"
No Offer
a
lean of abrenn
Vacation hear is permitted baccept any
Employment without pecerons &taining
Express Panction of the former & of the Secretar
1 Stats"
Japce
Rutt hov 4
n
with Fir R Merbert that the terms of ther
Existing ruler do not include this case,
therefore, forbid to Button from receiving But a hand Rule sude an
should he promulgated
see further
II can handy.
Jessered hitü
Rabubut
25/4
K
on 21440
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.